X10 Troubleshooting:

Fixing a 40 year old technology in the year 2022

Spoiler alert: It's the "Signal-Suckers"

More X10: the Heat pump problem solved

X10: On again, Off again

In 2019, I finally gave up on X10. My house has several lamps in the living room, and for years I used X10 to switch and dim them using an old plug-in X10 Mini Controller. I noticed that if modules were on the same power phase (120V circuit) as the controller, then they worked OK. When they were on the other leg, they never worked. I installed a passive coupler near my power box to no avail. So I limited the use to a single circuit and used a power strip to plug in 5 or 6 modules. Moving modules to other parts of my house just did not work. 

Since my X10 system was barely working on one circuit, I was reluctant to add RF control to the system.  Never mind PC or timer control. Adding more comms channels could only make the reliability worse was my (flawed) thinking.

Then in 2019 we installed a new AC / Heat pump unit for the house. X10 stopped working completely when the heat pump was on! You can imagine that my wife soon tired of "Hey honey, could you please turn off the heat so I can turn on the lights". I found this 5 circuit, $25 light control system on Amazon and removed all my X10 hardware. This worked fine for 4 years.  But only 5 circuits and no dimming was a step backwards from the good-old X10 days...

I investigated several WiFi solutions, and none were as simple, convenient, cheap, or reliable as a little button box to switch lights on and off. For me, the WiFi killer was the lack of a small, multiple-circuit button box like the X10 HR12A or even the old MC460.

I am reluctant to buy WiFi light bulbs. Light bulbs should be cheap and disposable. Having a WiFi controller and dimmer in a light bulb is just wrong to me. If you want dimming, use a dimable light bulb and a separate dimable controller. When the bulb or its power supply go bad as they inevitably will, you want to dispose of as little electronics as possible. Yeah, I know I'll never get color light bulbs with that thinking...

Now that I'm retired, I had some time to investigate the X10 problems that have always bugged me. I'm an EE, this shouldn't be so hard of a problem. I looked at commercial X10 signal tracers and decided they were expensive and limited. I wanted something that would:
To investigate my issue with X10, I built up a simple prototype X10 Signal Tracer. It couples the 120KHz X10 signal, filters out the 60Hz power line, and allows me to see the X10 raw signal and power line noise on my oscilloscope. It can:
test
        circuit

I threw this circuit together with parts I had on hand using the "Ready. Fire. Aim." approach to circuit design. I guessed that 10 turns per winding was about right for a 120KHz transformer. A toroid would work, but I didn't have any small toroid cores. So I used an old 1970's pot-core I had: Ferroxcube 2213,  3B7 ferrite, no gap. Any modern ferrite with Al of 4000-6000nH would work. I had a 3 winding bobbin which allowed the 2 windings to be separated, but a 2 winding bobbin would also work fine. I used 30AWG wire-wrap wire for the windings, figuring 2 layers of wire-wrap wire insulation would easily withstand 120VAC plus power line surges. I taped the core half's and bobbin together. The transformer inductance is 460uH, which should be fine. I tested the transformer frequency response using a function generator 1V p-p sine wave, and a scope. I had some film caps, 0.022uF, 400VDC. The circuit did an excellent job of isolating and reducing the AC 120VAC, 60 Hz. I started with a load resistor R1 of 1K. 499/510  ohms is better. 

The response at 100KHz is very good. I measured the 20KHz response and it was about 1/20 the 100KHz, so about -26db. There is a bit of resonance, so it's not really a high-pass filter. So it doesn't measure noise well, but does a good job at X10's 100KHz.

To scope the raw power line voltage, I just use a second scope probe on the raw AC Line (in x10 mode. Confusing, huh). Not the safest, but if I build this into a proper box, I'll add a voltage divider and just BNC outputs so I won't have to mess with probes. This is not a super-portable solution, but since modern scopes are small, it's not so terrible to lug one around the house to make some remote X10 measurements.

test proto

Here is a scope shot of X10 activity. This thing works great! This test is in my lab, where I have 4 power strips (signal-suckers) on 2 outlets. X10 works within this room, but the signals are not strong enough to pass to devices on the other phase. Note that at this scale, the X10 bursts cannot be seen at all on the 120VAC line. They are there, I promise. The test circuit is doing a fine job of filteing out the 60Hz. Also note the spike and other low level power line noise.

scope1

I was surprised to see three 1mS bursts per half-cycle, separated by 1.7mS. All of my X10 sources do this. After a bit of head scratching, I realized that this is to accommodate 3-phase power. These 3 pulses line up with the zero-crossings of 3 phase 60Hz power.  I have searched and searched for an X10 specification, and found none. Where is a bloody X10 electrical spec?

The signal above is about 500mV p-p. If you measure closer to the X10 source, the signal is about 2V p-p.

A lot has changed since the '70s

When X10 was designed in the late 70's, a home probably had no electrical loads that used switching power. Nowadays every wall wart, LED light bulb,TV, PC, charger, and dozens of other devices contain switching power supplies that operate between 40 and 200Khz. If they have a (valid) CE or FCC sticker, they should be OK. It's a miracle that X10 works at all. We do have CE testing, so thanks for that. Unfortunately, for nearly every switcher, there is one or more X safety rated capacitor across the line to filter the switching noise. These act as "Signal Suckers". Their low impedance at 120 KHz reduces the X10 signal. 

BTW I recently read the excellent The Art of Electronics X Chapters which has a section on p477 on TVS use in power strips, showing several power strip implementations.

I found that the main cause of my X10 loss is my numerous power strips. I use several large 12 outlet strips, and each one has a surge protector and filter. Here is a simplified schematic of such a power strip. The basic, non-surge, 6 outlet power strips generally have no filter or surge components.

power strip sch

X10 signals are carried on the line and neutral as "normal-mode" signals. The common-mode choke is there to reduce common-mode noise, and does not significantly reduce normal-mode (differential) signal of X10. The X safety rated, across the line, capacitor CX is the only component in the circuit that causes a significant reduction in X10 signal. Here is a table of capacitor impedance vs. capacitor values at 120 KHz, the X10 frequency, calculated using Xc = -j  / (2 * pi * 120KHz * C).

Capacitor
Impedance at 120KHz
(-j Ohms)
25nF: 53
50nF: 26.6
100nF: 13.3
200nF: 6.6
500nF: 2.6
1000nF: 1.3

These are all low impedance values that will shunt X10 signals, with the larger caps being particularly bad. My 1950's house has several power strips, all wired in parallel, and all shunting the X10 signal. To make it worse, any other devices with switching power supplies have X capacitors which shunt the X10 signals. This includes PCs, laser printers, TVs...

I measured a few power strip's capacitances. Any C meter can do this by simply measuring the AC Line to Neutral, making sure the power switch is ON.  I used my DER DE-5000 LCR meter at 1KHz. At 100KHz the values are generally lower. Here are a few power strip X capacitance measurements. All "surge arrestor" power strips have large X capacitors.
Here are the capacitance values of some office equipment I have:
I measured about 10 different switching power supplies from CUI, TDK, Meanwell, and Condor, plus a few PC power supplies. They all measured between 500 and 1200nF. Any of these is a significant signal-sucker.

I measured a handful of small phone and USB chargers and they all measure about 100pF. Apparently these do not contain large X capacitors.

I removed the 470nF X cap from a Belkin power strip that powers several X10 modules. X10 works better, but not on both sides of the power line though. This was not a simple operation. Many power strips are held together with one-way screws.  You need to push hard to get them out. I try to replace these with regular phillips screws. Here is the Belkin strip I modified. 

ps1

Here is the surge board with TVS covers removed. The 470 nF X-cap is the large grey rectangle. There are 6 orange TVS and 3 blue ones. Not sure how exactly they are wired.

ps2

Ready to re-install with the X-cap removed and the funky TVC covers back in place.

ps2

FilterLinc

I added a FilterLinc X10 Filter, model 1626-10 to my Lab / Office Computer circuit. This circuit is one of my worst Signal-Suckers with 2 power strips, a PC, Laser printer, Scanner, Monitor, and a host of other stuff. The results were excellent! X10 now works much better in the office and and even couples to the other phase throughout the house reasonably well. The X10 signals in his room and on this circuit went from marginally visible to quite strong.

I opened the FilterLink and it has high quality components, a proper fuse, and good construction. The design is a T- filter with 2 17 uH inductors and a considerable capacitor: 2.2uF. There are 2 capacitors bridging the inductors.

filterlinc

Conclusions

You can probably make X10 work. It will take work, since signal-suckers are everywhere.

If you can move some of your Signal-suckers to a non-X10 circuit, good. The further they are away (in house wire length) from the receivers, the better.

Try to replace large, filtered (surge) power strips with smaller, unfiltered ones.

If not, signal-suckers can be plugged into filters such as FilterLinc 1626-10 (10A) and 1626 (5A) or XPPF. Beware of running XPPF at >3A. It has no protection for over-current and there are stories of causing fires. Having a few FilterLinc's on hand is probably good.

It's probably not practical or safe for normal humans to modify their power strips to remove or reduce the X caps. Doing so reduces their filtering and possible surge arresting effectiveness a bit, but should have no other adverse effects. I did this on only one strip that is my main X10 strip with 6 modules.

Definitely do NOT remove any X-Caps from any switching power supplies. They are needed for noise and regulatory.

For phase coupling: use an active coupler or a separate RF receiver on each leg. My experience is that the passive ones are not very good.

Building a DIY X10 receiver??

All of the X10 receivers in the various X10 modules use proprietary ICs and circuits. I've build various frequency dependent de-modulators over the years. How hard can this be?  I considered building a modern X10 receiver using a combination of analog circuits and microprocessor. It should be able to:
The key is a good, low-cost amplitude (AM) demodulator / detector for the 120KHz X10 pulses. I considered a few options for this:
I like the Tayloe demodulator, It does frequency-dependent I-Q demodulation nicely and lends itself to low-frequency operation:

An isolating transformer can be fairly simple, consisting of a toroid core with a reasonable number of turns of insulating wire. This can be used for both receiving and transmitting x10.

Using an Arduino allows fancier and better dimming control such as LED trailing-edge dimmers. These use FETs instead of Triacs and allow better control of LEDs. Here's a video on these types of circuits. And another Youtube. The circuit is more complex than a simple Triac dimmer, but is more flexible. This could make possible X10 color lights, 12V lighting...

References

Here is another nerd's x10 noise musings that I found useful:
https://coreyswrite.com/electronics/home-automation/need-x10-signal-reliability-some-thoughts/   

Here is a nice list of X10 module schematics:
https://www.edcheung.com/automa/circuit.htm



  Dave's Home Page
More X10: the Heat pump problem solved

Last Updated: 4/10/2023